Top Insurance Automation Software in 2025

Gerard Newman, CTO By Gerard Newman, CTO Insurance 7 Min Read

In an industry as regulated and competitive as insurance, manual workflows are no longer sustainable. From underwriting to claims processing, insurers deal with complex documentation, siloed systems, and growing compliance demands. That’s why more companies are using insurance automation software to drive efficiency, reduce operational risk, and improve the customer experience.

This article reviews the top automation software for the insurance industry based on capabilities and integration options. We’ll also explore why insurers choose platforms like FlowForma to digitize processes without costly IT overhauls.

What is insurance automation software?

Insurance automation software is a specialized technology designed to streamline and digitize core insurance operations. 

It automates repetitive, manual tasks across the insurance lifecycle, such as policy creation, Know Your Customer (KYC) verification, underwriting, claims processing, compliance checks, and agent onboarding. 

Modern automation software for insurance comes with features such as:

  • AI assistants
  • Drag-and-drop workflow builders
  • Document generation and e-signatures
  • Rule-based approvals and task routing
  • Integration with CRM, ERP, and policy admin systems
  • Real-time collaboration and audit trails

Top 10 Automation Software for Insurance In 2025

Here’s a closer look at the top insurance automation software being used across the industry this year:

1. FlowForma - Built for teams that need speed and agility without complexity

FlowForma’s homepage AI-assisted process automation with FlowForma

FlowForma is designed for insurance teams that need to automate complex processes without adding technical complexity. Its no-code interface allows claims handlers, underwriters, and compliance staff to build workflows independently, speeding up implementation and giving business users full control over their processes.

With FlowForma’s advanced AI Copilot, users can create rules and logic using simple, natural language prompts. Whether routing claims based on predefined thresholds or hiding fields during underwriting reviews, the platform adapts quickly to changing business needs. 

Watch this interactive to see how FlowForma Copilot can build a claims management process in minutes. 

Besides, built-in tracking and audit trails also help insurers stay compliant with regulatory standards like GDPR or ISO 27701 for managing customers' privacy. And DORA for managing IT incidents and security. 

Another great feature of FlowForma is its seamless integration with Microsoft 365 tools like SharePoint, Teams, and Power BI. This means insurers can automate documentation, collaborate in real time, and generate insights from process data within the tools they already use. 

 

Pros

Cons

Easy to use with a user-friendly interface 

Requires SharePoint

Excellent customer care

 

Advanced AI capabilities

 

Purpose built and customizable

 

Transparent and easy to understand pricing

 

Rating: 4.5/5 on G2

Screen shot of FlowForma’s pricing page

 FlowForma’s pricing plan

2. Nintex – Built for organizations with IT-led automation strategies

Screenshot of Nintex’s homepageNintex homepage

Nintex is a workflow automation platform designed to support enterprise-wide process improvement. It also includes features such as RPA and document generation. Due to the platform's technical structure, insurers using Nintex typically rely on IT teams to build and maintain workflows.

Nintex integrates with Microsoft tools like SharePoint and Dynamics. While it offers broad automation capabilities, users often report a steeper learning curve for non-technical teams. Additional licensing costs may apply for features such as analytics, e-signatures, or advanced support.

In larger insurance organizations, Nintex is generally used for document approvals, internal audits, and cross-department workflows.

 

Pros

Cons

Can handle complex tasks

High cost for scaling 

Integrates with a variety of tools 

Expensive and difficult to set up

 

Requires IT support for most customizations

Rating: 4.2/5 on G2

The pricing structure for Nintex is not publicly available, but most reviewers on trusted sites like G2 indicate that the tool is at the top end of the enterprise pricing scale. 

3. MuleSoft – Built for system integration at scale

Screenshot of MuleSoft’s homepage

 MuleSoft offers process automation services assisted by AI agents

MuleSoft is primarily used to connect legacy systems and manage APIs across an enterprise. In insurance, it is often used to sync data between policy admin systems, CRMs, and claims platforms. MuleSoft is focused on integration rather than end-to-end workflow automation. 

The workflow logic must be developed using code or low-code modules, and technical teams are typically required for implementation and updates. 

 

Pros

Cons

Strong connectivity and integration capabilities

Difficult to initially set up 

Great customer support

Not designed for non-technical business users and has a steep learning curve

Rating: 4.4/5 on G2

MuleSoft features

Feature comparison of what MuleSoft offers

MuleSoft offers two pricing models based on whether you want to opt for subscription-based pricing (Anypoint Platform) and pricing based on connected apps and integration tasks. For the latter, users can choose between the Premier or Signature packages. Exact pricing is not publicly available. 

4. Creatio – Built for organizations combining CRM and process management

A screenshot of creatio’s homepage

Creatio homepage showing its core capabilities

Creatio offers both CRM and business process management capabilities in a unified platform. Insurers typically use it for sales pipeline tracking, lead management, and client onboarding. Workflow automation is available but is closely tied to CRM use cases.

Process building in Creatio uses a visual interface, but technical input may be required for more complex logic. The platform does not integrate deeply with Microsoft 365 tools, and many insurers adopt it as a part of a broader CRM initiative rather than a dedicated automation solution.

 

Pros

Cons

Combines CRM with process automation

Designed primarily for CRM-driven environments

User-friendly process builder 

Limited use cases and features

 

Complex workflow for third-party apps that may overwhelm new users 

 

Rating: 4.2/5 on G2

A screenshot of Creatio pricing model

Creatio pricing plans for 2025

Creatio offers three pricing models catering to different kinds of clients. The charges are on a per-user basis. 

5. Insly – Built for managing general agents (MGAs) and brokers managing client policies

 

Screenshot of Insly’s homepageA low code option designed explicitly for insurers

Insly is a cloud-based insurance software platform focused on brokers, MGAs, and small insurers. Policy management, quote generation, commission tracking, and simple workflow automation for back-office tasks are included.

The platform’s automation capabilities are primarily designed for use within the Insly ecosystem. While it supports user-configurable workflows, it does not provide extensive no-code customization or advanced document-handling features. Integration options outside its modules are limited.

 

Pros

Cons

Policy, billing, and commission tools in one system

Limited flexibility for workflow customization 

Designed for MGAs and small insurers

Integration options outside Insly ecosystem are limited

User-friendly interface 

 

 

Rating: Not enough data available on G2

 

Screenshot of Insly’s pricing model

 Insly offers two pricing models to its customers

6. Kissflow – Built for simple internal workflow tasks

Screenshot of Kissflow’s homepage

 The jack of all trades in the automation world 

Kissflow is a no-code platform for business process automation. It provides tools for form creation, task routing, and basic workflow tracking. Insurance teams use it primarily for internal operations such as procurement requests, HR onboarding, and vendor approvals.

Kissflow does not include industry-specific insurance capabilities, such as claims review automation or regulatory reporting. It lacks deep integration with insurance-specific systems and tools like Microsoft 365 or policy admin platforms.

 

Pros

Cons

No-code workflow builder for basic tasks)

Limited features for specific use  or application 

Quick to deploy for simple approvals)

Limited use in insurance data such as claims, underwriting, or compliance 

Rating: 4.3/5 on G2

 Screenshot of Kissflow’s pricing page

Kissflow offers two pricing models 

Kissflow offers two pricing models. Basic starts at $1,500 for 50 users. Enterprise pricing is hidden. 

7. BriteCore – Built for insurers using a cloud-native core system

A screenshot of BriteCore’s homepage

 BriteCore’s homepage

BriteCore offers policy, billing, and claims management within a single platform. It includes workflow features that support automation across the core insurance lifecycle. However, customization typically requires vendor support or technical resources, especially for complex workflows

Besides, BriteCore’s automation is available within its system and is not designed to operate independently of its core suite. The platform is used mainly by small to mid-sized carriers adopting new core systems.

 

Pros

Cons

Easy to use and accessible

Non-critical support is too slow 

Can integrate with multiple third-party apps

Slow and clunky

Dedicated support team for critical issues

 

Rating: 4.3/5 on G2

The pricing plans and structure for BriteCore are not publicly available. 

8. Guidewire – Built for enterprise insurers undergoing core transformation

A screenshot of Guidewire’s homepageGuidewire homepage 

 

Guidewire provides a complete insurance software suite for policy administration, billing, claims, and data analytics. It includes workflow and automation features integrated into its core modules. These features are not intended for business users to build independently. 

Besides, implementation typically involves long lead times and changes often require IT involvement or partner consultants.

 

Pros

Cons

Comprehensive solution for insurance

Costly for smaller insurance companies

 

Requires specialists due to its complex processes

Rating: 4.1/5 on G2

While pricing data for Guidewire is not publicly available, it is quite apparent from the reviews that it is an expensive tool to set up and maintain. The tool is not too intuitive and may require either specialist users or external consultants, which will further increase the overall cost for your business. 

9. Sapiens – Built for insurers modernizing core systems

Screenshot from Sapiens DataSuite page

 DataSuite is one of the many insurance suites Sapiens offers

Sapiens offers a wide range of core systems for life, health, property and casualty (P&C) insurance, and reinsurance. Automation features are integrated into its policy, billing, and claims products. Customization is usually handled by Sapiens or implementation partners.

Workflow logic is embedded within the platform’s core modules and is not accessible through a drag-and-drop interface. The solution is generally adopted as part of a broader core modernization program.

 

Pros

Cons

Easy to use 

Expensive 

Comes with the right capabilities for insurance applications

The UI needs improvement for a modern look 

Rating: Not enough data on G2

Sapiens does not publish its pricing information publicly, but a few reviews on the internet suggest that the tool is on the pricier side. Sapiens has multiple solutions under its umbrella, and it’s likely that the price you’ll get will be a combination based on your business's requirements. 

10. Xactware by Verisk – Built for property claims estimation workflows

 

Screenshot of the Xactware homepage

Xactware homepage

Xactware, part of Verisk, provides tools for estimating property damage and processing claims. Its most well-known product, Xactimate, is used by adjusters and insurers to standardize assessments and generate documentation.

Workflow capabilities are limited to estimation-related processes. They do not include tools for building cross-department workflows, automating underwriting, or handling compliance documentation. Their primary use case is within property claims teams.

Rating: Pricing for Xactware isn’t available but Xactimate is rated 4.4/5 on G2.

Comparison of the 10 best insurance workflow software in 2025 

Software

Best for

No-code options

Native Microsoft 365 integration

Industrial use-case

Compliance and audit tools

FlowForma

Business and IT-led insurance automation

Yes

Yes

Claims, underwriting, audits

Yes

Nintex

IT-led automation

No

Yes

Claims, workflows

Yes

MuleSoft

Complex data integration

No

Limited

System integration

Limited

Creatio

CRM-driven workflows

Limited

No

Onboarding, sales processes

Limited

Insly

Broker/MGA workflows

Yes

No

Quotes, commissions

Limited

Kissflow

Basic business process automation

Yes

No

HR, procurement

No

BriteCore

Core system workflows

Limited

No

Claims, policy workflows

Yes

Guidewire

Core transformation projects

No

No

Full insurance lifecycle

Yes

Sapiens

Core platform modernization

No

No

Life, health, P&C

Yes

Xactware

Claims estimation

No

No

Adjusting, inspections

Limited

Why FlowForma Stands Out For End-To-End Insurance Automation

Manual, fragmented workflows slow insurance operations, increase compliance risk, and frustrate both teams and customers. Among the aforementioned insurance automation software, FlowForma is the only platform that delivers insurance-grade process automation with:

  • No-code configuration so business teams and IT leaders can build workflows
  • Deep Microsoft 365 integration, including SharePoint and Teams
  • Built-in compliance support, including audit trails and approval logic
  • AI Copilot and AI agents making it faster than ever to create dynamic insurance workflows

A screenshot of a testimonial from one of FlowForma's customers, AONA testimonial from one of FlowForma's customers, AON

Whether you're looking to accelerate claims, streamline underwriting, or digitize compliance processes, FlowForma helps insurers get up and running quickly without a heavy tech investment.

Ready to simplify your workflows and stay ahead of regulatory demands? Start your free trial or book a personalized demo today.

Gerard Newman, CTO

Gerard has over 20 years of experience designing and delivering process automation solutions that have allowed businesses to integrate and automate their operations to deliver better customer experiences and improve efficiency. Gerard is focused on ideating new concepts for our product’s roadmap helping businesses to make the complex simple.

Gerard Newman, CTO

Recent posts by Gerard newman

Insurance Automation Software
Insurance

Top Insurance Automation Software in 2025

In an industry as regulated and competitive as insurance, manual workflows are no ...

Insurance claims process
Insurance

Claims Process Automation Simplified in 6 Steps

Claims processing has long been slow and manual, filled with paperwork and delays. ...

Financial Services

Streamline Efficiency with Document Automation for Financial Services

What’s slowing down the smartest minds in finance? It is the market shifts, ...